The God of Religion and the God of Philosophy

نویسنده

  • ROBIN ATTFIELD
چکیده

PHILOSOPHY Ever since the time of Pascal men have feared that the 'God' worshipped by believers and the 'God' contemplated by philosophers were somehow different. The former was personal, historically active, slow to anger and plentiful in mercy: the latter was dubiously able to be described in personal terms at all, and infinite in such a way as to baffle the imagination. The 'God' of the former at least had the advantage of complying with what was alleged to be religious experience: and so it was not surprising that religious men feared that the 'God' of philosophy threatened that experience itself; whereas at times philosophers have fed such suspicions by denying to God various properties not on logical grounds but because close involvement with man seemed to them not to comport with the divine dignity. Before tackling the question of the relation of the different beliefs involved, I must locate the problem. At least this much is clear: the problem concerns two concepts, not two Gods. It might be thought that the only way to make progress is to discuss God himself, rather than human notions: ultimately we are interested in what answers to our notions, and not just in the notions themselves. But we cannot assume that there is something answering to every notion, nor that even when there is, there are as many things as notions. In the present case no one is suggesting that there are two Gods; indeed this is impossible on either view, since there cannot be more than one omni potent agent. The 'Gods' of religion and of philosophy are therefore ideas, though ideas which may themselves have an application. They are different accounts of what it is to be God, accounts which allow us to have some idea what we are asking when we ask if God exists or what we are confessing when we declare belief in God. Neither among religious men nor among philosophers is there agreement as to the nature of God. But on the side of religion, the Judaeo-Christian tradition at least supplies some common ground between what individual Jews and Christians have at various times believed. On the other hand there is much less agreement among philosophers. A large number of practising philosophers in Britain today are atheists or agnostics: and, although to be an atheist or an agnostic one needs a notion of God to deny or …

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Are Miracles Violations of the Laws of Nature?

Classical theism holds that God rules the world not only indirectly, by the natural laws established with creation, but through actions or direct interventions that interfere with natural processes and human actions. These direct interventions are usually called miracles. Modern Western philosophy, at least starting from Spinoza and Hume, has defined miracles as “violations of the laws of natur...

متن کامل

Kant’s Philosophy of Religion and the Challenges of Moral Commitment

Kant believes that the concepts of a just and compassionate God and the life beyond death spring from our rational need to unite happiness with virtue. But since Kant had banished happiness from any place in moral reasoning, his philosophy of religion have been deemed as not merely discontinuous with his ethics but radically opposed to it. This article tries to argue against this apparent incon...

متن کامل

A Comparative Study of Martin Buber and Rumi on God-Man Relation

The issue of relation, particularly that of human relation to God stands for one of the most significant concerns by all men of faith. To realize such a relation Martin Buber and Rumi, two globally acclaimed thinkers, have appropriated independent existences for both God and man to make them eligible for having a relation to each other, and they have brought this relationship to the fore in the...

متن کامل

Thinking as Evidence for the Probability of the Existence of a God: An Argument from Unnaturalness for Necessity

The objective of this article is to show that it is justified to assert that the existence of God is plausible, considering the fact that thinking itself is an immediate outcome (effect) of a thinker (cause). This idea may seem evident, but it is in fact challenged by certain claims of cognitive philosophers who aver that our knowledge of necessity and causation is, i...

متن کامل

Kant and Demystification of Ethics and Religion

Kant's demystification is meant to put away any metaphysical and revealed elements from ethics and religion. Kant, fulfilling this, first argues that metaphysical questions of reason, from theoretical aspect, have no certain answers. In practical reason, he establishes his moral foundations, based on own human being without any referring to metaphysical bases. In fact, Kant places human being a...

متن کامل

Human Freedom and Moral Responsibility In The Light of Theistic Beliefs

Theistic and atheistic beliefs respectively play a fundamental role in the definition of man's free will and moral responsibility, so far as they can determine the nature, quality, and quantity of human's freedom. After believing in God, the belief in a revealed or a non-revealed religion and the manner in which God’s attributes are interpreted play an essential role in the definition of free w...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2008